We have what's called an honest minority assumption, that we just need one prover to be online and participating. And so one of the things that we want in these prover networks is some amount of redundancy. So 100 to 1 means that even if 99% of all the provers in the world just suddenly go offline, the ZK roll-up still keeps on progressing forward. The costliness of these provers are extremely high; there's only one because of how high they are. With further optimizations of each one of their own tech stack, you get some improvements. Is there any magnitude more block space do we get as a result of all of these things? Right, right

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode