Is It a Good Thing Africa?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Mtematpeks. Garle malcolmus actually says very clearly that self help is one thing. But we have to understand that we are in a position where we've been wholly disadvantage. And so in order for us to help ourselves, we need to be given what we are own. Is simple as tat. So i am sorry x gave the black powder movement. This is where reparation come from the debate. To invokue them is just, is im sorys a kind of madness. There is his whole logi, but iis, unfortunately, is not true. G d p is the very worst way to measure a improvement. The reason ethiop

Should there be a broad programme of reparations – not just financial compensation, but acknowledgement of the crimes committed and the lasting damage caused by slavery? Or would this just worsen social tensions by reopening old wounds? That's the theme of this week's Sunday Debate. Arguing for the motion were Kehinde Andrews, Professor of Black Studies at Birmingham City University; and Esther Stanford-Xosei, reparations activist and lawyer. Arguing against the motion were Katharine Birbalsingh, headmistress and co-founder of Michaela Community School in London; and Tony Sewell, educational consultant and CEO of the charity Generating Genius. The debate was chaired by social historian and presenter Emma Dabiri.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/intelligencesquared.

See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices