Is It Too Much Is It Too in the Weeds?

Sart is a fundamentally dualist thinker and i don't think he would even object to that as a characterization unlike some other character like we called the liza or what wait on we called him a mult whatever. He did not attend lectures of alexander koshev in the nineteen thirties on haggle but I think it's part of the air and france  and his ideas about human reality are dialectical. Human reality is dialectical subjectivity is dialectical, sart says. The for itself just is what it is the for itself is dialectical it's in contradiction It's negating it's the source of negation's source of nothingness