Speaker 1
Everyone wants to see seret inde bet a hero. Because he hadn't know that was how everyone regarded him, and he didn't want to be the guy who would affirm fired the hero, rightyeathho was desperate for positive headlines and a deal ofof ordeal or development. In the start of the pademic, when evryone wasobposly very anxious abouter. The fact that he noticed this far just arrived, and we didn't have any proper protection against it. And and he wanted something that made him look decisive, look like he was in control. And, like you say, created a hero, or him and severt as as the heroes of the moment. And it all horribly back fired. Because ithin he as caved into the pressure from severt who just spent couple of weeks tweating like mad, you know, about how how terribly the government was handling the pandemic and eyet basically, and then cashed im at his leisure, that's right. And im, i think, i'm still convinced that er nothing would have, we would have celebrated hu younge if, if everything turned have turned out to be fine, if shewert fonineit would have been this. I wouldn't have been the scam artist. And these facemens would even if these facemens would have been ofo good quality, then then i think, e, we all have been so mad right now. But yet, it went horribly wrong. And er ye, it's e, it's a mess. Wih, it's a mess. And also, in the bottom and also, an interesting moment in the debate was when peter omsert as speaking peter omsert was, of course, a sadia m p. And at the time, he was also, e very much involved in, you know, getting ere, getting rid of all shorteces. There were dozens of initiatives and proposals coming in, and they were all sent to te to the health ministry.