The Importance of Raymond Gruyere

I think that what in the fold Heidegger gets mentioned actually more than probably anywhere else I would assume at least in the early chapters. There's a couple of mentions of the the Zvi fault the exactly because it is a Heideggerian concept and uses the fold to talk about the ontological difference between being and beings right? But he only really appears in a long footnote and difference in repetition and apart from that sort of a pervasive influence that's rarely mentioned. It almost feels like something where somebody said well you're if you're doing it on difference don't you need to have him in there but in any case yeah I could see that.