rawsin: The study a moral dumfound moral dumbfounding case. He admits that the cycreview paper was responsible, probably, for getting him tenure. But i an interesting paper in that there was nothing really to analyze in terms of the methods of it. It was just presenting a, a description of a phenomenon we all kind of felt like had some reflected some sort of reality,. Even if it was presenting it too strongly.
Is social psychology just a kid dressing up in grown-up science clothes? Are the methods in social psychology--hypothesis-driven experiments and model-building--appropriate for the state of the field? Or do these methods lead to a narrowing of vision, stifled creativity, and a lack of informed curiosity about the social world> David and Tamler discuss the strong methodological critique of psychology from two of its leading practitioners - Paul Rozin and Solomon Asch.
Plus, food porn, real estate porn, outrage porn, and David's personal favorite - power washing porn.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: