Criminal cover image

Novak v. City of Parma

Criminal

Parody Is a Critical Instrument in Public Debate

3min Snip

00:00
Play full episode
The Supreme Court sided with Hustler magazine. Their opinion made it clear that Hustler's parody was in fact, protected speech. Professor Little says law treats parody like a quote, favored child. And what you see is a pattern that if a particular type of humor can be fit into the concept of a parody then it's much more likely that whoever made the parody joke will be insulated from legal liability.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode