AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
3min chapter
Novak v. City of Parma
Criminal
Parody Is a Critical Instrument in Public Debate
The Supreme Court sided with Hustler magazine. Their opinion made it clear that Hustler's parody was in fact, protected speech. Professor Little says law treats parody like a quote, favored child. And what you see is a pattern that if a particular type of humor can be fit into the concept of a parody then it's much more likely that whoever made the parody joke will be insulated from legal liability.
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode