A Pandemic That Isn't I

Sorobert was trying to get the science around pandemics in a journal. The paper passed pierreview after three rounds, lots of revisions. They didn't like some of the stuff we were concluding. We softened them. We changed them and it finally got accepted for publication somewhere around mid-January. But then an anonymous third party peer review said that they didn't feel like our conclusions were substantiated. That person overruled the four peer reviewers of three senior governmental scientists and an i c u Expert, and said,. those conclusions unsubstantiated.