The best case scenario for a small group is a bunch of average people with one leader who's really good That tends to work. But if you had a wildly divergent group wouldn't they say everything stays? Remember they're wildly divergent So would they allow Tweets to say we should round up and murder all of them? It's an interesting question, isn't it? I feel like yes. The smartest person tends to have a little more influence because people go out What do you think you're the smartest?
My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
- Screen Apnea is a thing
- Jake Tapper removed from prime time
- How seasonal flu deaths are counted
- Gavin Newsom vs. democrat narratives
- Things that died this year from scrutiny
- Twitter's election integrity group
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support