There are literally proofs in science itself, particularly within physics that some physical property. So the physical properties are undecidable. And it's due by the way to self reference. It would be relatively unsurprising to think well just when we just talk about reality as a whole, should we expect it to be paradoxical or non paradoxical right? I think it's quite reasonable to say well you know we should really expect some paradoxes.
Neuroscientist and author Erik Hoel talks about his book, The World Behind the World, with EconTalk's Russ Roberts. Is it possible to reconcile the seemingly subjective inner world of human experience with the seemingly objective outer world of observation, measurement, and science? Despite the promise of neuroscience, Hoel argues that this reconciliation is surprisingly difficult. Join Hoel and Roberts for a wide-ranging exploration of what it means to be human and the limits of science in helping us understand who we are.