The Religious Bonus Rights Case: Groffy to Joy

This is a free speech case, it doesn't have to be anything that's rooted in their religious beliefs. A restaurant could turn away a local Atheist meetup group because allowing them to occupy a large section of the dining space is expressing that the restaurant supports their viewpoint. I don't see anything here that limits this case from extending to those situations. Jesus Christ, so this is worse than I thought it was. Okay, that's depressing. But we only have so much time to talk though. That would be groffy to joy. This one we also talked about in the headlines in the diatribe. Now, unlike the 303 Creative Decision, which was decided along partisan lines

Transcript

Play full episode

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!

Get the app