When you lack that, it becomes very hard for and this is completely separate from whether it's a valid and inciteful way to to conduct your research. And i'm not sure had likei, ye, no, that's a good way of putting it. I totally agree with you that that valuability is key. But what are the rules if some new, young, non thomas nagel person put something like that with no citations, no real field other than like kim and like, like, no literature? What are the criteriaOther than just this is, this is really illuminating, and i find it fascinating.
Is social psychology just a kid dressing up in grown-up science clothes? Are the methods in social psychology--hypothesis-driven experiments and model-building--appropriate for the state of the field? Or do these methods lead to a narrowing of vision, stifled creativity, and a lack of informed curiosity about the social world> David and Tamler discuss the strong methodological critique of psychology from two of its leading practitioners - Paul Rozin and Solomon Asch.
Plus, food porn, real estate porn, outrage porn, and David's personal favorite - power washing porn.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: