One of the things that i find interesting about your work and retanism, broader moral tradition is very condeno in surprising directions. But alot time, differet philosophical outlooks would have come together and red with neat packages of views. Whereas, by the nature of it, you might have quite radical and quite surprising views about what changes in the world do or don't serve to maximize happiness over pains. So as funny, bhat to bring bat out, this an example. One of your first famous papers argues that our obligations to help people are much less constrained by the extent to which we know them than we might think. And again if you're a citizen of an affluan country