Leibnes's Distinction

i think the main thing that we have to come away with here from last time is the cant verses won't distinction, and how important that is going to be for securing what leibnes wants out of this argument. T he's also trying not to be spinoza bright, which es to say, the whole thing just gets folded back into divinity. Ye, he is trying to just be a traditional theist, tri to be trditinal theist in in a rationalist context. And it's unclear what god has to do with any of this.