What Is the Point of the Male Gaze?

Molvey's reading hinges on the idea that, like, it is possible to master the object in view. But when you see gaze as obje, and you see it as the limit of that which you can master, then it takes on a completely different veilence. The inabilitythe master is what's going on at thewithwith, with e twith the gaze, or the male gaze. So i wonder if gaze had been correctly understood as objectye, would this kind of feminist thing developing in a different way? Or was it just, or would it just not have developed at all?