Unreliable Practices in Bite Mark Analysis

The chapter explores the problematic history and challenges of bite mark analysis in forensic science, including unethical practices, lack of scientific validation, and financial incentives. It sheds light on cases like Michael West, who exploited the field for financial gain, and a dentist fabricating bite mark evidence for homicide cases, showcasing the lack of oversight and credibility in the use of bite mark analysis. The narrative also delves into disturbing incidents of forensic experts manipulating evidence and creating fake bite marks, leading to legal repercussions and the discrediting of these so-called experts.