Reasonable Disagreement and Reasonable Doctrine

Nosic down the hall is an irrational person, because his principles and his corps ideas are, are themselves irrational or just nuts. So then why wouldn't, why wouldn't nosi be reasonable? Except forn maybe, maybe rolls just thought he used an unreasonable amount of italics in his writing,. But, i mean, that those would seem to apply to nosic. And it's very hard to sort through exactly what the reasonable is and what what can do with it. There are plenty of libertarian views on which just isn't true. I don't think ross can rule you out as having an unreasonable conception of justice. He certainly can't rule a johnmasemarket