The American Scholar's Fable - The One Man

Samni'm not so sure about that. But shall we get back to the substance of it? I think we should have a discussion about mark, your claim is that it's utterly vacuous and completely repetative. What's added in terms of that mulling over and that going back and forth? And i agree that he goes over things and covers ground again. But to me, there's added value, often in those retracings, and it's not as repetitive or vacuous in his repetativeness one would hope.