B c h is trying to occupy a middle ground, but it's not possible to reconcile. I can't really imagine a layatoo that becomes very successful that doesn't also create upwards pressure on base layer fees. Light natwork kind of stretchers the the designd space, like what seem possible in terms of bitcoin layor two. But i don't know how many ar transactions are necessary for them - they still depend heavily on getting included in bases.
In this episode, Su and Hasu talk about blockspace market mechanisms and EIP-1559. Read Hasu's analysis of EIP-1559 (w/ Georgios Konstantopoulos)
Topics covered:
- what EIP-1559 is and the problems it solves
- negative-sum vs zero-sum vs positive-sum proposals
- reasons against EIP-1559
- what, if anything, can Bitcoin learn from EIP-1559
- impact on long-term security
- how realistic perpetual issuance is in Bitcoin
- elastic blocksize proposals in Bitcoin
- lessons from the scaling debate
- how parasitic L2s can threaten baselayer security
- how dApps benefit from EIP-1559
- building dApps on appchains vs Ethereum
- why every chain incl. Ethereum specializes over time
- first-price auction vs fixed-price sale
- EIP-1559 as an oracle for on-chain congestion
- moving the Overton window for changes to Bitcoin
Su Zhu is the CEO and CIO of Three Arrows Capital.
Hasu is a cryptocurrency researcher and writer.
Together, they publish on Deribit Insights and uncommoncore.co.