Does the Case Stand or Fall Based on Leisner?

The defence is going to say he was entitled to that money, and he put tin his wife's account. The reason that she was in charge as probably because she was not aware of the moneys. I think he's going to have a significant impact as to whether or not the ative that the government is trying to describe holts. And if his testimony survives a very vicious cross examination, i think that's going to set the tone for the remainder of the trial.